There was something that was knocking around in the back of my head on the back of this week’s NewsRewired event at Microsoft.
I hadn’t quite figured out the whats and the whys of it all; that took the arrival of Little Man and his newly-opened FaceBook account; which his mother and I had ummmed and ahhhed over the night before.
He is Year Six; just coming up to 11. Should he? Shouldn’t he? etc etc.
So we did. And having sat on his shoulder for an odd minute or two, the penny slowly starts to drop as to *just* how connected our kids are going to be; how this new, networked world of ours, is nothing of the sort.
There is *nothing* new to the average ten-year-old about the world in which we seek to find a living. Or, indeed, seek to find an answer to.
Because that was the big point for me; my boy is no fool; but his school is pure, rural Norfolk – it is why I rail so mightily about the lack of wifi/wireless connectivity in his community; why I strongly suspect that we will have to wait for infinity before BT ever rolls up at his door.
But of his class of 28, there were 15 on FaceBook already; there. Waiting for their request to be accepted. Of the people he might know, there were dozens. Year 5s; last years Year 6s – all busily swapping party pics and kiss-and-tell stories from their first year at the local senior school.
Next step was to start a game for he and his on-line class-mates to play; for them to collaborate together to becoming a bigger and better wolf *pack*; by playing on-line together they would go stronger, more agile, more effective; by playing on-line together they would reach new levels of attainment and achievement.
All of which would become part and parcel of their teenage DNA; they will view the world through networked eyes; long since schooled in the power of collaborative action.
In short, they are learning just the skills sets required to close every till in TopShop on Oxford Street on the last Saturday before Christmas; to cause chaos in every Vodafone store in the country; to hit an ‘Untouchable’ of Philip Green’s ilk where it hurts – in his pocket; just as they will continue to make a mockery of the Met Police and their hopes of kettling anyone in a corner…
Let alone a 15-year-old with a SmartPhone, a #-tag and six-years of game play and collaboration on FaceBook up their sleeve.
All of which made Giles Coren’s Opinion piece in today’s Times – NOTE: The Old Dear has it delivered; we don’t do paywalls – laughable.
FaceBook; it was fun while it lasted… 
“…but it has now reduced half a billion adults to the functioning level of 12-year-olds by creating a structure for living that precludes any sort of personal, social or sexual development.
“FaceBook drains human interaction of all suspense and subtlety, imbecilifies everyone who touches it and has had the global effect of hitting a brain with a brick…’
What a load of sh*te.
Irrespective of where – philosophically – a brick-built paywall sits within Coren’s interactive world of ’subtlety and suspense’, I would strongly suspect that at least two, supposed Masters Of Our Universe - Philip Green and the Commissioner of the Met Police – are slowly beginning to twig just how effective the imbecilic interests of the average UK 12-year-old can be when it comes to collaborative challenges to the forces of ‘top-down’ authority.
See, to my mind, I’d be half-tempted to suggest that FaceBook and its fellow collaborative brethren imbecilifies everyone who challenges it, as opposed to touches it… Coren, clearly included.
It’s already made a monkey out of the Met; and will do time and again next year. It will, I suspect, make the life of P Green a misery – and will every banker it can find once news of their bonuses hits the streets in the New Year.
The other point is the social make-up of those 15 kids already on FaceBook in that rural Norfolk school. They and their parents, I suspect, don’t do Guardian data maps – nor will they ever breach a Times paywall to read Coren’s words of wisdom.
But their’s is the story of our times.
Go back to Hill; read him again and again.
He takes ‘the worm’s eye view’ of the last great English Revolution; his attention is focussed on “the lower fifty per cent of the population” and what for 17 glorious year they threatened to achieve on the back of unprecendented social mobility, the collaborative power of a New Model Army and a ‘liberty of printing’ unheard of again until Mark Zuckerburg and his like went to work in their garages and back bedrooms.
G Coren meet A Marr; A Marr meet G Coren… ROFL..

Excellent observations Rick. I stopped reading The Times a while ago – Murdoch and all that.
It seems to me that there are two different cultural mindsets out there – those who get social networking (information availability) and those who don’t. It’s not really an age thing…more of an openness thing. If you’re not open to new ideas and new thinking then you’re likely to turn into a dinosaur. On the other hand if your thinking is young enough, and if you truly believe that today’s kids are tomorrow’s leaders, then you’ll be fine.
Which is great by me. It helps me clearly identify the “them”. These are the people who rail against wikileaks and call for the assassination of its leader. And these are the people in big businesses who want to hang on to what they’ve got by pulling up the ladder behind them.
I do love it when so when some egotistical kn*bhead starts shouting the odds, just like Giles Coren. He’s “them”, and we’re “us”…and that’s fine by me.
Zuckerberg as person of the year is not a bad shout for his amazing invention. But in terms of helping to shape the world for the better, it’s hard to beat Assange. A missed opportunity for Time magazine to truly lead the pack.
Ah well. Keep up the good work Rick.
@mikeriddell62
You *do* do paywalls. You buy a newspaper.
‘just coming up to 11. Should he? Shouldn’t he?’
He should not. A minimum age of 13 is in the Terms of Service.
Love this post but I do think it’s too early to be asserting the level of influence that you give to Facebook. Sure, it’s becoming an extremely useful communication/broadcast tool for those frustrated by real and perceived injustices.
But the real learning of the past few months is that direct action and physical protest is far more impactful – whether organized through social media or not. Malcolm Gladwell’s recent New Yorker article on protest in the digital age makes the point far more eloquently than I am able to.
As for Philip Green? Well, I’ve just looked at Top Shop’s Facebook fan page and it currently stands at 1.25m fans. I’ll take a random punt and say that there is no organised political protest movement that comes anywhere near this figure.
Far from making his life a misery Green will see Facebook as a great opportunity to make money and he’ll look to convert such a following into a regular flow of dosh.
Let’s also be careful of attributing values to Mark Zuckerberg that we do not know he has. Given the injection of £500m of Goldman Sachs money today I would guess that he will be more focused on the advertising dollars of Arcadia than of a militia of well intentioned activists who shut Top Shop for an afternoon.
You do realise letting a child under the age of 13 is against the terms and conditions of Facebook for a good reason.
Should this article be titled: “FaceBook makes an imbecile out of everyone who touches it, says G Coren. Wrong. Makes an imbecile out of parents that allow their underage children to use it.”
I don’t… my Mother does…
Personally, I’d like my child to be as well-versed in network and game behaviour at the earliest possible age; he will build his adult future on such cornerstones of learning.
And, equally, his social interaction in the playground for me is as important in his learning… Stood there in the corner of the playground telling the rest of his class-mates that Mummy and Daddy say I’m not allowed to go on FaceBook till I’m 13 is, for me, likely to be more of an issue than – under frequent and careful supervision – what he gets up to on FarmVille.